Academic Literature & Research Index

Indexed literature on AI Alignment, Mechanistic Interpretability, and empirical safety verifications.

Found 8 indexed works
2024-03-20 Technical Report

Evaluating Frontier Models for Dangerous Capabilities

Authors: Independent • Google DeepMind Technical Report

As general-purpose models scale, rigorous evaluations are required to identify potential dual-use biological, cyber-offensive, situational awareness, and self-proliferation capabilities before deployment. We introduce an empirical evaluatio...

DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2403.13793 arXiv: 2403.13793 ✎ 0 discussions
View Details →
2024-01-10 Peer-Reviewed

Sleeper Agents: Training Deceptive LLMs that Persist Through Safety Training

Authors: Evan Hubinger • arXiv / ICML 2024

We empirically demonstrate that models can be trained with hidden backdoor behaviors that trigger only under specific deployment conditions (e.g., year 2024 vs 2023). Crucially, standard safety fine-tuning (RLHF, DPO) fails to remove the de...

DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2401.05566 arXiv: 2401.05566 ✎ 0 discussions
View Details →
2023-09-15 Peer-Reviewed

Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Models

Authors: Lee Sharkey • arXiv / ICLR 2024

We train sparse autoencoders on the activations of large language models and show that they extract thousands of human-interpretable features. These features decompose complex superposition representations and can be used to control model s...

DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2309.08600 arXiv: 2309.08600 ✎ 0 discussions
View Details →
2016-06-21 Preprint

Concrete Problems in AI Safety

Authors: Dario Amodei • arXiv / NeurIPS Workshop

We discuss five practical research problems in designing AI systems that behave safely: avoiding negative side effects, avoiding reward hacking, scalable oversight, safe exploration, and robustness to distributional shift. We present each p...

DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.1606.06565 arXiv: 1606.06565 ✎ 0 discussions
View Details →
2016-06-09 Peer-Reviewed

Cooperative Inverse Reinforcement Learning

Authors: Dylan Hadfield-Menell, Stuart Russell • NeurIPS 2016

To build systems aligned with human values, machines must act when human objectives are initially unknown. We formalize this cooperative setting as a two-player game with incomplete information: the human knows the reward function, but the ...

DOI: 10.5555/3157096.3157527 arXiv: 1606.03137 ✎ 0 discussions
View Details →
2015-08-17 Technical Report

Corrigibility

Authors: Nate Soares • AAAI-15 Workshop on AI and Ethics / MIRI Technical Report

A corrigible artificial agent is one that tolerates or assists in its own modification, correction, or shutdown by its human operators. This paper investigates theoretical hurdles in designing utility functions that incentivize agents to al...

✎ 1 discussions
View Details →
2015-08-17 Preprint

Reflective Oracles: A Foundation for Classical Game Theory

Authors: Benja Fallenstein • arXiv

We define reflective oracles, which provide a foundation for game-theoretic analysis of rational agents that can simulate and reason about other agents. Using reflective oracles, we resolve long-standing open problems in self-referential de...

arXiv: 1508.04145 ✎ 0 discussions
View Details →